Entry details

Curzon
Author

Curzon

Date

September 29th, 2005

Tags

,

Comments

4 Comments so far.
Add yours.

Buffer States, Part 2: Afghanistan

Part 1: Himalayas

As Russia conquered the independent Turkish kingdoms of Tashkent and Bokhara (modern-day Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan), the southern border of the Russian Empire crept closer and closer to British India. At one point in the mid-19th century, Russian, British, and Chinese territorial claims (although not actual control) overlapped in the Hindu Kush Mountain range. Of course, the remote and desolate region had no resources and few assets, but the three empires, particularly Britain and Russia, knew a common border meant war.

So what did they do? They set up a buffer state: Afghanistan.

Russia and Britain gave up just enough territory in the Hindu Kish to give Afghanistan that strange “Ëœfinger’ of territory that stretches out to touch China, and make sure that Russia Turkestan and British India did not touch. All conflicts would be with Afghanistan, not with each other.

Tragically, as we are seeing today, the borders were drawn with no regard for the ethnic makeup of the region. Uzbeks and Tajiks live outside of their designated state homelands in the north, Nuristanis and Pashtuns live on both sides of the border with Pakistan, and Balochi communities are split up between Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. The state is an ethnic polyglot that for all intents and purposes should not exist. It is little wonder that the region has been so unstable for much of its modern existence.

(See more maps of Afghanistan’s ethnic divide here, here, and here.)

Comments to this entry

Kenneth
September 29, 2005
2:46 am
Must be a right headache for the military in Afghanistan.
Eddie
September 29, 2005
11:06 am
This is an excellent series Curzon. What, if any, possible evolution could ever occur with Afghanistan's borders? Especially in regards to Pakistan (with its porous tribal borderlands), as its chances of remaining a "nation" of sorts lies in the continued endangered survival of President Musharraf.
Dan
September 29, 2005
1:22 pm
What is the relationship between the Pashtuns and the Balochis?
Curzon
September 29, 2005
5:04 pm
Eddie: Thanks for the kind words. The border won't change unless there is a total breakdown of law and order, or the state collapses. As in all of these border disputes, people agree the borders are messed up, but always think it is the other side that should back down... no one wants to give away land.

Dan: I don't hear much about the Balochis today, but they were independent (Balochistan) until the early 20th century and were apparently pretty warlike (hence their independence?), but you can read more from people who actually know about this stuff "here.":http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baluchistan