Through the 17th and 18th centuries, Britain and France battled for political and commercial supremacy in western Africa. 
The 1783 Treaty of Versailles gave Great Britain possession of the Gambia River area, while the French kept most of the inner continent, including the rolling, sandy plains of the western Sabel desert known as the Senegal region. These peculiar borders remained after Senegal became independent in 1960 and The Gambia became independent in 1965.
These peculiar borders cause trouble, as The Gambia blocks the most direct routes between the two halfs of Senegal. This has often caused problems for Senegal, most recently yesterday:
On Tuesday, some Senegalese soldiers were briefly held in Gambia’s capital. The group of soldiers were taking the shortest route between northern Senegal and its southern region, Casamance, which cuts across Gambia – and doing a little shopping on the way. They were detained in Banjul market, and taken off to answer questions about what Senegalese soldiers were doing in Gambia, armed and in uniform, without permission. They had crossed by the Banjul ferry, at the mouth of the Gambia River.The Trans-Gambia Highway, which runs further inland, has effectively been closed to cross-border traffic for over a month by Senegalese transporters protesting against the sudden doubling of charges to cross the river on the small and unreliable ferry.
President Abdoulaye Wade—a buddy of Mr. Bush—suggested three ways to break the deadlock.
- Gambia should build a bridge over the river
- Senegal could operate its own ferry
- As a last resort, Senegal could tunnel under Gambia – which is only about 35km wide.
Sounds nuts, but there are longer tunnels, including the Chunnel. China has apparently offered to help build it.

Comments to this entry
Alfred Russel Wallace
September 21, 2005
2:04 pm
Africa has many things it could spend money on - a chunnel is surely close to the bottom of the list!
Peter
September 21, 2005
4:17 pm
cirby
September 21, 2005
8:01 pm
Curzon
September 21, 2005
8:16 pm
Of course, Senegal, with a rather kickass military and 7x the population, could always annex The Gambia...
Eddie
September 21, 2005
11:00 pm
(reading Ralph Peters's "New Glory" section about Africa).
Seriously, a ferry service would be quite feasible. I don't believe either country (even with foreign assistance ala China) has or will soon have the infrastructure to maintain a chunnel.
lirelou
September 22, 2005
12:16 am
Curzon
September 22, 2005
12:28 am
I don't think Senegal, Gambia, Mali et al are even at the level of "ethnicity" -- it remains tribe v.s. tribe. Heck, the Gambia only has a population of 1.1 million yet they have three official languages (not including English, the common language), plus other local dialects.
Eddie -- South Africa may be a regional hegemon if it ever gets its act together (i.e. stops being the crime capital of the world), but Bolivia is closer to the US than the Gambia is to South Africa. Don't expect to see Pretoria solving border disputes in the Sahara anytime soon.
maskull
September 22, 2005
3:53 pm
Re-engineering the flow of the river should suit the Senegalese as well.
Completion of the project would be unnecessary. Once serious work began, The Gambia would capitulate.
cirby
September 23, 2005
7:41 pm
Yeah,, but for the price of a 35 km tunnel (in the tens of billions, at least), offering someone twenty to thirty times their annual income sure makes for a different argument.
Or, to put it another way, offering the million or so Gambians $10,000 each would be a helluva impetus (about the amount they'd earn in their entire adult lifetimes, at current per capita income there).
J.Kende
September 23, 2005
8:27 pm
sun bin
October 1, 2005
10:27 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caprivi