Simon’s World, one of our top referrers (thanks, Simon!), had this to say after linking to my post on Koizumi’s victory and the return of the incumbent LDP to power:
The irony is the poor performance of the DPJ opposition will create another virtual monopoly in Japanese politics – a loss for democracy and for the competition in ideas that has driven Japan to a point of reform.
A valid point, but the alleged loss for democracy is a hard case to make. Japan’s opposition has long been pathetic. When the Socialist Party of Japan (JSP) took power at the head of a coalition government in 1994, they ran a terrible government with no direction that floundered for a few years before the people grugingly returned the LDP to power.
Similarly, the DPJ was not an effective alternative to the LDP. The party was a motley crew of anti-LDP politicians with no common ground beyond their opposition to the incument government. This has worked in some countries in the past, but not when the composition ranges from free market radicals to far Left critics to boring moderate centrists to right-wing hardliners. The DPJ only talked about “changing the administration.” No one had any idea what the government would look like. And with the politicians who made up the party, any administration would have been a discombobulated disaster if it came to power.
In the West, many people support opposition parties because they are dissatisfied with the incumbent party. In Japan, I long heard many people say the opposite: “I would back the DPJ, but I have no idea where they stand or what they would do if they took power, so I support the LDP…”
Remember that Koizumi’s crushing victory is compounded by the fact that it all began with him expelling no fewer than 30 members of his own party, and replacing many of the old politicians with reform-minded youngsters. The LDP will, for the forseeable future, be a party of center-right reformists with a mild nationalist streak. Koizumi is expected to push through an agenda to clean up Japan’s appalling public sector. But this shift is not a permanent entrenchment of LDP power, and the rebuke to the opposition has taught the opposition that they can’t get away with vague promises to “change Japan by changing the party in power.” In the long term, this is welcome news for Japanese democracy: prune the orchard and the best trees survive.

Comments to this entry
Simon
September 13, 2005
5:07 am
The problem is at last the DPJ was coalessing into a somewhat reasonable opposition party and a true alternative government. They were right that Koizumi was effectively campaigning on a single issue (albeit a big one) whereas they had reform plans across the spectrum. Koizumi has dragged the LDP into the 20th Century (too much to hope they make it to this century, but one thing at a time) and has been forced to in part because the DPJ were emerging as a serious threat. The decimation of DPJ is great news for Koizumi...but I'm sceptical of how far he'll push reform. the shame of it is this was the best chance to have a real two party system...now we're regressing to a one and a half system again.
"Change Japan. Change the LDP". That slogan says more about the lack of democracy in Japan than anything else.
Curzon
September 13, 2005
6:14 am
The best times for reform in the United States, for both the left and the right, were during times of electoral landslides. Witness FDR in the 1930s and Reagan in the 1980s. That's a mandate, not bad democracy.
I maintain that the DPJ was a bad joke of an opposition party, and this election bodes well for the future of Japan's opposition. Additionally, a two party system is unsustainable when you have a parliament with a large number of seats chosen through a system of proportional representation.
But the tabloids in Japan agree with you -- headlines like "Koizumi's Evil Empire!" and "The Day Democracy Died" are apparently everywhere today.
shakuhachi
September 13, 2005
7:01 am
Simon
September 13, 2005
8:10 am
Granted the DPJ wasn't perfect (show me any party that is). But at least they were forming the nucleus of a viable opposition that in time may present an alternative government to Japan. Where's the choise now? It's the LDP way or no way. Previously at least within the LDP there was opposition. Now there's not even that.
shakuhachi
September 13, 2005
12:39 pm
Mutantfrog
September 13, 2005
2:10 pm
Remember, Koizumi didn't throw out members of the LDP and then appoint replacements himself- every single member of the lower house was up for reelection, and anyone who voted for an LDP candidate knew quite clearly that they were voting for postal reform, and probably for some of Koizumi's other reform proposals, which had been shelved since his popularity began to decline a couple of years ago.
Part of the problem was that the DPJ lacked good leadership. Okada was well known, but far from popular. Maybe the DPJ will take this horribly missed opportunity to get their act together and produce a more coherent platform, that more of their members will actually endorse.
asiapundit
September 13, 2005
5:32 pm
First they came for the dog lovers, and I did not speak out because I am a cat owner. The Singapore blogosphere is reacting strongly to the sedition charges against the two Singaporeans who made racist comments on bulletin
Curzon
September 13, 2005
11:20 pm
Simon
September 14, 2005
12:39 am
I don't pretend the DPJ are perfect, or even any good. But can anyone nominate the group that now forms Japan's loyal opposition, that will keep Koizumi and the LDP honest (so to speak). It wasn't long ago everyone thought the DPJ were a real chance, which perhaps spurred Koizumi to finally force the Japan Post issue. Who's going to do that now?
Adamu
September 14, 2005
9:58 pm
You Do Have To Be Mad To Be In Politics » Tufts E-News: Questioning ‘Party’ Politics — By asking (Political Review)
July 4, 2007
1:59 pm