Entry details

Chirol
Author

Chirol

Date

September 1st, 2005

Tags

, , ,

Comments

12 Comments so far.
Add yours.

Kicking Victims When They’re Down

Many of you out there may have read the outrageous claims by Germany’s Environmental Minister that, yes, the US is directly to blame for the hurricane because of global warming. However, in a rare display of objectivity and actual reporting, the Spiegel’s English version ran the following article debunking that nonsensical statement.

Kicking Hurricane Victims While They’re Down

Hurricane Katrina has cost the lives of hundreds and devastated the US Gulf Coast. But instead of aid donations and sympathy, the Americans have heard little more than a haughty “I told you so” from Germany. It’s another low point for trans-Atlantic relations—and set off by a German minister. How pathetic.

At a moment when the dead on the Gulf Coast are still being counted, the German minister of the environment could think of nothing better to do than—in an essay published Tuesday in the center-left daily Frankfurter Rundschau—to blame the US itself for the catastrophe. The piece is 493 words long, and not a single one of them is wasted to express any sort of sympathy for the victims of the storm. The worst of it is that Trittin isn’t alone with his cold, malicious tenor. The coverage from much of the German media tends in the same direction: If Bush had only listened to Uncle Trittin and signed the Kyoto Protocol, then this never would have happened.

Bullshit. Trittin’s article is a slap in the face to all the victims. Let’s just assume that the environment minister is right, that there is a direct relationship between greenhouse gases and Hurricane Katrina. Even still this would hardly be the time for yet another round of America bashing and finger pointing. Three years ago, just before the US election, former Minister of Justice Hertha Däubler Gmelin compared US President George W. Bush to Adolf Hitler. This time, with German elections looming, the environment minister is using a natural catastrophe as an excuse to once again campaign with subtle anti-Americanism and to unabashedly pat himself on the back. A “Kyoto Two” is “desperately needed” screamed the headline over his insensitive attack.

There are scientists and Nobel Prize winners who see the problem of global warming totally different than Trittin. Many consider the fight against AIDS, hunger and malaria as higher priorities than a reduction of carbon dioxide output. Last year, some of these experts jointly published the “Copenhagen Consensus,” in which they outlined the greatest problems facing the world. Global warming figured low on the list. And believe it or not, the scientists are not on the payroll of the Texas oil industry. But that’s hardly the point at the moment. Right now, the situation calls for empathy with the people in the American south who are suffering the after effects of the massive storm.

It’s not the American people’s fault that the storm hit and they couldn’t have stopped it. The Germans, on the other hand, could have done a lot to prevent World War II. And yet, care packages still rained down from US troops. Trittin’s know-it-all stance is therefore not only tasteless, it is also historically blind.

Comments to this entry

ron Patterson
September 1, 2005
1:33 pm
Can we not make them pay economically? Slap quots on German goods until there is an official apolegy. These attacks are unjustified and fan the flames of anti-americanism. When it cost to create problems for the U.S. then these idiots will be stopped by their own people.
snow
September 1, 2005
2:42 pm
I get tired of hearing the Kyoto Protocol party line. Sure, global warming exists and may be causing many of these weather-related problems in the world. The problem with Kyoto is that it won't accomplish much or anything at all. It's a non-solution.

What's the use of signing on to a totally useless and ineffective plan? One doesn't have to deny that global warming exists to believe that this treaty will accomplish next to nil, and still cost us big time. Why not put our resources into things that will achieve real results?

And why is it that the left is willing to put billions and trillions into something that has a minute chance of success (even the treaty aims at miniscule successes, at best) whereas they blow their stacks at the cash being poured into Iraq, which costs far less than Kyoto would and at least has better (though still not good) odds of success?
Curzon
September 1, 2005
2:54 pm
Snow makes an important point there about where the Left wants to put its cash resources. These people are blowing their tops over the cost of Iraq -- we could have asked 2,144,876 PHDs to cure cancer, AIDS, and malaria! we could have spent $53,621 on every Palestinian refugee! -- but have no idea how much more Kyoto would cost us. And that these alternatives are cited just show how much these people don't understand resource allocation and money management.

Part of this reason is that most on the Far Left are not involved in making money -- they're involved in non-profit or education where the bottom line is not important. Once people start to make money they tend to become more realistic, and, dare I say it, conservative.
Chief Wiggum
September 1, 2005
3:49 pm
I've heard that the average global temperature will rise 3 degrees celsius by the end of this century if the Kyoto goals are not met. If the Kyoto goals _are_ met, the temperature will only increase 2.86 degrees.

Why do the Germans love to dump on the United States? They are tired of being shackled to their Nazi past, and of being the poster child for the worst behavior of mankind. I think there is a deliberate attempt by the krauts to make the U.S. the new international bad guy, to get Germany off the hook as it were.
cirby
September 1, 2005
4:43 pm
The US needs to pull our troops out of Germany.

Now.

Not next week, not next year.

Since they dislike us so much, they should be glad to see us leave (and take our greenhouse gas creating tanks and planes and millions of dollars per year with us).
J.Kende
September 1, 2005
6:54 pm
Totally agree with Snow, Curzon, and CW here.... I just need to point out that it isn't _everyone_ involved in nonprofit and education work that has no concept of money. Just well over 90%...

I'm involved in work with both, among other things, and it's terrible seeing up close how much wealth is just wasted and destroyed by those who have no concept of math or economics. They generally just don't have a basic understanding of the science of things, or of how creating wealth actually works or what it is, and so instead make up social theories to believe in to make themselves "smart" and "educated".

There is a trend in nonprofit and education work towards entrepreneurship models, using profit driven methods to achieve civic goals... But it is a constant struggle against those who would rather stagnate and make an ideology of their stagnation.

As with Germany and Environmentalists, they often care little for actual results or objective analysis of data, but rather are in it just to advance their own group cause, science be damned.

On Kyoto: it has always been a terrible plan. Methane is a bigger concern than CO2, increasing national wealth in the form of a growing middle class (and in America, _everyone_ is middle class in the true sense of the term) does more to improve environmental conditions than any other indicator, and the real measurement of environmental progress comes from putting resources into efforts that gain substantial and world changing results -- as the Copenhagen Consensus discusses at length. Kyoto fails at all three of those, while "succeeding" only in limiting economic growth, and therefore limiting the resources we have to use in fighting environmental threats.

It's insanity in the form of social, economic, and foreign policy all balled into one. But when dealing with the people who advocate it... what else is new?
Grendel
September 2, 2005
8:06 am
Chirol, when reporting about Germany, especially what the government has to say about other countries, you should better look to the foreign ministry than to the ministry of environment. Mr Trittin doesn't know much about international politics and diplomacy. Anyway, your report is completely out of balance and doesn't tell half the story - even more, you're mixing topics and hopping from one to the other. A point I absolutely agree to is that right now, immediate help and sympathy is crucial, not name-calling.

The foreign ministry is the official place to look to in any case. So, what did the foreign ministry had to say to the US in the last few days?

"Information Services":http://www.germany-info.org/relaunch/info/consular_services/Hurricane_Katrina_2005.html

"press release September 1st":http://www.germany-info.org/relaunch/info/press/releases/pr_09_01b_05.htm

"chancellor Schröder":http://www.germany-info.org/relaunch/info/press/releases/pr_09_01_05.htm

"The citizens of the United States should know that Germany is truly and firmly at their side"Â?

"foreign minister Fischer":http://www.germany-info.org/relaunch/info/press/releases/pr_09_01a_05.htm

In case the last link's content is too short, here's an excerpt from the German foreign ministry newsletter:

"Mit Trauer und Entsetzen habe ich die verheerenden Zerstörungen des Hurrikans Katrina in Louisiana, Mississippi und Alabama und den anderen betroffenen Gebieten verfolgt. Unsere Gedanken sind bei den Angehörigen der zahlreichen Opfer, den vielen Verletzten sowie allen Menschen, die ihr Heim verloren haben oder um Angehörige und Freunde bangen. Unsere Solidarität muss den betroffenen Menschen gelten.
Den Helferinnen und Helfern vor Ort wünsche ich viel Kraft und Durchhaltevermögen. Die Bundesregierung ist zu jedweder Hilfeleistung und Unterstützung bereit, um dieser entsetzlichen Naturkatastrophe Herr zu werden bzw. deren Folgen zu beseitigen."


I guess that writing about these statements the first six commentators wouldn't have much to complain about, but then, well, it's the desired target audience, let's make them happy. The connection from Trittin to Hitler? Would have expected that to read something like that over at David's Medienkritik, but not here.

Isn't it strange how leaving out major parts of a story can distort it as much as in the initial posting? Chirol, I don't think you did it intentionally, but your own expectations led to the result above.

About the "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_protocol":Kyoto protocol, although I understand the arguments of opposing countries, I guess you'd agree that international cooperation is neccessary to address climate change and pollution. How it's done or should be is another matter, as you wrote, the debate is still ongoing.
Chirol
September 2, 2005
9:45 am
Grendel: First of all, the article I linked to was a response to the Minister's statement as when I blogged this, the original statement had already been linked to a million times. And you'll note, I did spefically say it was the environmental minister and NOT the government itself. I wasn't even implying that anywhere.

Secondly, I agree comparing Trittin to Hitler is ridiculous. I don't take anyone seriously who makes such outrageous statements. And I agree with you, that's the kind of blind right wing nonsense the Davids Medienkritik people like to spit out.

The point here is that Schroeder or Fischer should have come out and apologized for what Tritin said since Trittin wouldn't and only repeated it. Of course the Chancellor woulnd't say anything so ridiculous (usually) but he represents his coutnry and government and shouldn't allow an idiot like that to make public statements that were immediately picked up all over America. Trittin should be at least publically reprimanded if not fired.

Mr Trittin doesn't know much about international politics and diplomacy.

Yeah, it shows. Get rid of him or at least shut him up =)
Grendel
September 2, 2005
10:19 am
There're a lot of people who make remarks without thinking twice about it. Lot of times it's from the wrong people, about the wrong subject, at the wrong time in a wrong way. On higher level, i.e. executive branch level, you still have nevertheless people who make statements they rather shouldn't have. Not to minimize the error and harm done, but just to look at it from another angle...

Clinton to Chancellor Kohl
"I was thinking of you last night, Helmut, because I watched the sumo
wrestling on television."
http://www.gargaro.com/clintonquotes.html

Bush to Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso
"Do you have blacks, too?"
http://www.thetruthaboutgeorge.com/bushisms/
http://slate.msn.com/id/76886/

I'm not getting further into Bushisms, it's just that if you really pick up statements like that of Trittin and call for apologies, previous commentators joyfully tune in, bashing and revealing their lack of understanding of political (Cirby) and economic interrelations (Ron Patterson obviously forgot American companies were the first who were hit when everybody called for a boycott of French goods two years ago). Foreign Minister Fischer and Chancellor Schröder did the right in this case, confirming the close ties and support for the people in distress, rather than keeping themselves with contraproductive comments from the Minister of Environment. McClellan and others wouldn't do much else than correcting and apologizing for the executive slips of tongue, either... ;-)

If I take a look at the "German Ministry of Environment's website":http://www.bmu.de/allgemein/aktuell/160.php , I see an appeal for funds to help Louisiana. That's what counts to me.
Chirol
September 2, 2005
10:52 am
Of course everyone is guilty of a slip of the tongue now and again, but your examples (the "do you have blacks" is apochryphal) aren't comparable. Making a silly statement under normal circumstances and publically attacking the president after the worst natural disaster in decades is completely different. The situation here is the important factor, not to mention that the ones you mention aren't attacks from politicians with radical agendas.
matthewstinson.net
September 2, 2005
5:33 pm
Of zealots and vultures

Color me unsurprised that fringe Christian groups operating in the mode of Fred Phelps and Jerry Falwell see in Katrina the hand of an avenging God. Repent America, which I’ve never heard of, and will probably never hear of again, has issued th...
matthewstinson.net » Of zealots and vultures
September 2, 2005
6:41 pm
[...] …and abroad (h/t ComingAnarchy), from the German environmental minister… Apparently the Americans had it coming: “The American president has closed his eyes to the economic and human damage that natural catastrophes such as Katrina — in other words, disasters caused by a lack of climate protection measures — can visit on his country.” Who wrote this? None other than Jürgen Trittin, Germany’s minister of the environment. [...]