Comments on: You deserve your money back

By: Curzon

Curzon — Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:11:57 +0000

Addressing Kenneth specifically, but everyone in general: I’m not saying that all our readers are Bush fans (not even all the contributors are Bush fans!), but I don’t see any of you paying money to buy a shirt that says “Axis of Evil” with the faces of Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld.

Ron Patterson, that comment is enough inspiration for a whole new post.

By: Mutantfrog

Mutantfrog — Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:23:53 +0000

Here's some of my thoughts on why Kim Jong Il is still alive, and going to be for a while longer. Link

By: futuremongolian

futuremongolian — Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:48:14 +0000

those who support Bush now wont have much to talk about in the next 5 years, he has totally destroyed any possibility of a lasting, positive legacy.

By: Kenneth

Kenneth — Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:43:31 +0000

I do not support Bush, and I think his foreign policy has been an unprecendented disaster.

By: ron Patterson

ron Patterson — Mon, 29 Aug 2005 14:31:03 +0000

Why is kim jong il still alive

By: Mutantfrog

Mutantfrog — Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:47:23 +0000

I’m pretty anti-Bush, but I’m even more anti-bumper sticker.

By: Gabriel Mihalache

Gabriel Mihalache — Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:59:29 +0000

That man lost all of the respect I might have had for him when he said his favorite philosopher is Jesus. While I do agree that Jesus’s work on ethics is influential, although highly canonical and stifling, he said little or nothing on the nature of language, the philosophy of the mind, advanced epistemology, and so on… everything that a 21th century philosophy consumer might require.

I suggest Bush should spend less time in church and more time in Austin, Texas, at the UT. Their philosophy department is da bomb. Word! :-)

By: J.Kende

J.Kende — Mon, 29 Aug 2005 06:22:44 +0000

Yes, people remotely interested in world affairs tend to realize the Bush administration has been a disaster for world affairs. They also usually frame their remotely informed views of foreign affairs or the Bush administration in terms which try to sneak in their claim to sole possession of fact without justification or ability to withstand close examination. For those of us who are significantly more than remotely informed, we don’t need to use such rhetorical gimmicks of value so remote and minimal they are barely worth mention.

Surely anyone with the slight bit of awareness of the world you have must realize the informed among us can see right through you.

By: ron Patterson

ron Patterson — Mon, 29 Aug 2005 06:06:06 +0000

Anyone remotely interested in world affairs realizes what a disaster that the Bush administration is. Good intentions , and plans do not make up for poor execution and missed oppurtunites. Being to th eleft does not automatically mean blind.

By: adamu

adamu — Mon, 29 Aug 2005 05:15:03 +0000

Well, one would hope that some in the “left” who would buy that stuff read your site as well as Bush supporters. You know, to open a free dialogue in a frank bipartisan manner.