Comments on: Crappy BBC Commentary: Part, like, 38 http://cominganarchy.com/2005/08/28/crappy-bbc-commentary-part-like-38/ Speak Victorian, Think Pagan Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:04:45 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Joe http://cominganarchy.com/2005/08/28/crappy-bbc-commentary-part-like-38/comment-page-1/#comment-19454 Joe Sun, 28 Aug 2005 15:52:41 +0000 http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=1043#comment-19454 "They are not sophisticated thinkers on world affairs, they are at home with guns." Well, I like guns. Does that make me an unsophisticated thinker on world affairs? (Besides that, shouldn't that comma be a colon or semicolon or em-dash or something?) And this is just great: "President Bush cannot look Cindy Sheehan in the eye and tell her that her son died because the White House messed up. But a future president will." Which future president would that be? Dennis Kucinich? “They are not sophisticated thinkers on world affairs, they are at home with guns.” Well, I like guns. Does that make me an unsophisticated thinker on world affairs? (Besides that, shouldn’t that comma be a colon or semicolon or em-dash or something?)

And this is just great: “President Bush cannot look Cindy Sheehan in the eye and tell her that her son died because the White House messed up. But a future president will.” Which future president would that be? Dennis Kucinich?

]]> By: mark safranski http://cominganarchy.com/2005/08/28/crappy-bbc-commentary-part-like-38/comment-page-1/#comment-19452 mark safranski Sun, 28 Aug 2005 15:14:37 +0000 http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=1043#comment-19452 It takes quite the ignorant tool to make me look back fondly at Dan Rather but this Webb character succeeded. It takes quite the ignorant tool to make me look back fondly at Dan Rather but this Webb character succeeded.

]]>