Entry details

Curzon
Author

Curzon

Date

August 8th, 2005

Tags

, ,

Comments

8 Comments so far.
Add yours.

Does the Left want us to lose in Iraq? Why?

Christopher Hitchens can be an ass sometimes, but when he’s good, he’s good.

[Iraq] is a combat defined very much by the nature of the enemy, which one might think was so obviously and palpably evil that the very thought of its victory would make any decent person shudder. It is, moreover, a critical front in a much wider struggle against a vicious and totalitarian ideology…

Preach it. An American defeat in Iraq would be terrifying beyond comprehension.

How can so many people watch this as if they were spectators, handicapping and rating the successes and failures from some imagined position of neutrality? Do they suppose that a defeat in Iraq would be a defeat only for the Bush administration? The United States is awash in human rights groups, feminist organizations, ecological foundations, and committees for the rights of minorities. How come there is not a huge voluntary effort to help and to publicize the efforts to find the hundreds of thousands of “missing” Iraqis, to support Iraqi women’s battle against fundamentalists, to assist in the recuperation of the marsh Arab wetlands, and to underwrite the struggle of the Kurds, the largest stateless people in the Middle East? Is Abu Ghraib really the only subject that interests our humanitarians?

Question: Why have several large American cities not already announced that they are going to become sister cities with Baghdad and help raise money and awareness to aid Dr. Tamimi [the current mayor of Baghdad]? When I put this question to a number of serious anti-war friends, their answer was to the effect that it’s the job of the administration to allocate the money, so that there’s little room or need for civic action. I find this difficult to credit: For day after day last month I could not escape the news of the gigantic “Live 8” enterprise, which urged governments to do more along existing lines by way of debt relief and aid for Africa. Isn’t there a single drop of solidarity and compassion left over for the people of Iraq, after three decades of tyranny, war, and sanctions and now an assault from the vilest movement on the face of the planet? Unless someone gives me a persuasive reason to think otherwise, my provisional conclusion is that the human rights and charitable “communities” have taken a pass on Iraq for political reasons that are not very creditable. And so we watch with detached curiosity, from dry land, to see whether the Iraqis will sink or swim. For shame.

Hell yeah.

Comments to this entry

Alfred Russel Wallace
August 8, 2005
6:21 pm
Shame indeed. I am embarrassed to be so distant from supporting the Iraqis, who are in my prayers ...
Daniel Nexon
August 9, 2005
2:58 am
" When I put this question to a number of serious anti-war friends, their answer was to the effect that it's the job of the administration to allocate the money, so that there's little room or need for civic action. I find this difficult to credit: For day after day last month I could not escape the news of the gigantic "Live 8"Â? enterprise, which urged governments to do more along existing lines by way of debt relief and aid for Africa."

Non-sequitor (sister-city pairings vs. Live 8).

Maybe America's cities are too busy scrambling to pay for all the unfunded mandates thrown at them by Washington to do very much.

Seriously, why the heck is Hitchen's bitching about his anti-war friends not collecting pennies for the wounded children of Iraq? Why isn't he bitching at the Bush administration for running empire "on the cheap?" The impact of "sister cities" is negligible compared to the resources the Federal government could be throwing at Iraq, if it weren't more concerned with tax cuts and payoffs to the oil industry...
adamu
August 9, 2005
3:06 am
He's got a point, but putting his ideas another way makes it easier to understand why people aren't bending over backwards: Why aren't people lining up to celebrate and support a war they never wanted to begin with? For one because there's an irrational feeling among people that helping Iraq rebuild would mean admitting that Bush was right all along.

Personally, I'm not ashamed that I haven't given money to Iraq OR Live 8. I'm still getting on my feet, dammit.
ron Patterson
August 9, 2005
3:14 am
Great post. But a reply might be that the current administration by 'going it alone" without our traditional allies and by condeming, slandering, critics of how the war has been conducted has created a 'them versus Us" mentality. This mentallity has has deepened the divide and means that any support for the Iraqi people equates with support for the war. Sad but true. Bush and his advisors arrogance have poisoned the debate.
Curzon
August 9, 2005
5:33 am
All good points. I just wish I heard the left talking more about how vital success in Iraq really is... to everything.
Kushibo
August 9, 2005
8:09 am
When someone like Hillary Clinton talks about sticking it out in Iraq till the job is done, she is derided as talking conservative to pander to votes.

If the "left" says let's get out now, they're criticized for partisanship and Bush-bashing. If they say something that might remotely indicate support for some aspect of what's going on in Iraq, they are mocked as late-comers finally admitting, as Adamu suggests, that Bush was right all along.

I agree with Ron Patterson, that it is the Bush supporters who have poisoned the debate.

Things are still a mess, and with no real end in sight and battles still raging, we are hardly ready to call this an unqualified success. Bush should swallow some humble pie, admit he was wrong about WMDs and that he needs to seek common ground with the Democrats who know that Iraq and the Middle East will likely be better off when and if Iraq has a stable democracy that recognizes human rights, acknowledging that supporting that latter goal does not mean acceptance of how and why he started the war.
Joe
August 9, 2005
3:36 pm
Of course, you also have to figure that, once we've paid for all of the administration's spending on rebuilding Iraq, we're going to need debt relief ourselves.

(ducks)
ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » Municipal Coup D’eta
August 11, 2005
7:55 am
[...] And Chris Hitchens had such nice words for Mayor Tamimi just the other day… [...]