Christopher Hitchens can be an ass sometimes, but when he’s good, he’s good.
[Iraq] is a combat defined very much by the nature of the enemy, which one might think was so obviously and palpably evil that the very thought of its victory would make any decent person shudder. It is, moreover, a critical front in a much wider struggle against a vicious and totalitarian ideology…
Preach it. An American defeat in Iraq would be terrifying beyond comprehension.
How can so many people watch this as if they were spectators, handicapping and rating the successes and failures from some imagined position of neutrality? Do they suppose that a defeat in Iraq would be a defeat only for the Bush administration? The United States is awash in human rights groups, feminist organizations, ecological foundations, and committees for the rights of minorities. How come there is not a huge voluntary effort to help and to publicize the efforts to find the hundreds of thousands of “missing” Iraqis, to support Iraqi women’s battle against fundamentalists, to assist in the recuperation of the marsh Arab wetlands, and to underwrite the struggle of the Kurds, the largest stateless people in the Middle East? Is Abu Ghraib really the only subject that interests our humanitarians?Question: Why have several large American cities not already announced that they are going to become sister cities with Baghdad and help raise money and awareness to aid Dr. Tamimi [the current mayor of Baghdad]? When I put this question to a number of serious anti-war friends, their answer was to the effect that it’s the job of the administration to allocate the money, so that there’s little room or need for civic action. I find this difficult to credit: For day after day last month I could not escape the news of the gigantic “Live 8” enterprise, which urged governments to do more along existing lines by way of debt relief and aid for Africa. Isn’t there a single drop of solidarity and compassion left over for the people of Iraq, after three decades of tyranny, war, and sanctions and now an assault from the vilest movement on the face of the planet? Unless someone gives me a persuasive reason to think otherwise, my provisional conclusion is that the human rights and charitable “communities” have taken a pass on Iraq for political reasons that are not very creditable. And so we watch with detached curiosity, from dry land, to see whether the Iraqis will sink or swim. For shame.
Hell yeah.

Comments to this entry
Alfred Russel Wallace
August 8, 2005
6:21 pm
Daniel Nexon
August 9, 2005
2:58 am
Non-sequitor (sister-city pairings vs. Live 8).
Maybe America's cities are too busy scrambling to pay for all the unfunded mandates thrown at them by Washington to do very much.
Seriously, why the heck is Hitchen's bitching about his anti-war friends not collecting pennies for the wounded children of Iraq? Why isn't he bitching at the Bush administration for running empire "on the cheap?" The impact of "sister cities" is negligible compared to the resources the Federal government could be throwing at Iraq, if it weren't more concerned with tax cuts and payoffs to the oil industry...
adamu
August 9, 2005
3:06 am
Personally, I'm not ashamed that I haven't given money to Iraq OR Live 8. I'm still getting on my feet, dammit.
ron Patterson
August 9, 2005
3:14 am
Curzon
August 9, 2005
5:33 am
Kushibo
August 9, 2005
8:09 am
If the "left" says let's get out now, they're criticized for partisanship and Bush-bashing. If they say something that might remotely indicate support for some aspect of what's going on in Iraq, they are mocked as late-comers finally admitting, as Adamu suggests, that Bush was right all along.
I agree with Ron Patterson, that it is the Bush supporters who have poisoned the debate.
Things are still a mess, and with no real end in sight and battles still raging, we are hardly ready to call this an unqualified success. Bush should swallow some humble pie, admit he was wrong about WMDs and that he needs to seek common ground with the Democrats who know that Iraq and the Middle East will likely be better off when and if Iraq has a stable democracy that recognizes human rights, acknowledging that supporting that latter goal does not mean acceptance of how and why he started the war.
Joe
August 9, 2005
3:36 pm
(ducks)
ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » Municipal Coup D’eta
August 11, 2005
7:55 am