Japan’s oft-sensational Mainichi Shinbun has some pretty stunning pictures from the last years of World War II and the aftermath. While people tend to get pretty emotional over this topic, the pictures give a pretty balanced picture of the Japanese experience, reflecting both the utter tyrrany and total devestation that was the Japanese experience before and after the end of the war.
Looking through the pictures, two in particular brought home what to me was the true nature of the fight between Japan and the US: a war over resources.

Children gather wood to use for wood-fuel vehicles in this 1941 photo. Civilians were banned from using gasoline in 1941 as it was needed for the war effort.

Schoolboys gather pine-tree roots to use for as aviation fuel in this 1945 photo.
No gasoline? I’ve read about coal-fueled trucks in North Korea, but vehicles that run on wood? Planes that run on pine roots?! This is how desperate Japan was in the final stages of war: they had no energy and were desperate for something, anything to keep the country moving.
Of course, energy was the reason Japan bombed Pearl Harbor in the first place. After a decade-long war in Manchuria and the China coast, in which western public opinion strongly sided with the Chiang Kai-shek’s Nationalist government, Britain and the United States imposed a scrap metal boycott on Japan. This was followed by a freeze of Japanese assets, the closing of the Panama Canal to Japanese shipping, and finally, an oil boycott.
The oil boycott was an enormous threat to Japan. With few reserves and high dependence on foreign oil, namely Rising Sun (the Japanese affiliate of Royal Dutch/Shell) and Stanvac, a joint venture of US oil companies, Japan’s war machine was in danger of shutting down competely unless it could obtain new supplies in Southeast Asia. Japan, a country with no oil resources, had a choice: back out of China or escalate. They chose the later, hoping to hit the US hard enough and get them to accept that Japan was too formidable an enemy to defeat.
Energy was Japan’s Achilles’ Heel. In the end, despite the utter devastation, Japan wasn’t defeated—it was starved. In the final phases of the war, warships were sent off to battle without enough fuel for the journey home. The country came to a standstill.
In truth, this is how wars were won for much of the 20th century. Instead of defeating the enemy, starve them—cut off their energy supply lines. In many ways, the same is true today, and is one of many reasons why keeping our oil supplies diverse and secure is so important.

Comments to this entry
IJ
August 2, 2005
1:09 pm
Following WW2, the United Nations was created with a special economic agency, the International Monetary Fund. The new IMF was intended to prevent the 'beggar thy neighbour" policies that led to the world war involving Germany. The drafters had good intentions, but adequate enforcement has proved impossible internationally.
The drafters of the UN Charter didn't seem to think that addressing a cause of the world war with Japan (energy) was practical.
Alfred Russel Wallace
August 2, 2005
3:15 pm
Spark ignition engines can run on gas, so the children's fuel could be used on vehicles that had a gasifier. There are great pictures of vehicles with gasifiers at http://www.woodgas.com/History.htm . The roots must have been converted into gas and on to liquids to make fuels for planes.
IJ
August 2, 2005
4:32 pm
This "article":http://www.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/geted.pl5?eo20050801a1.htm from Chatham House talks of many new geopolitical factors that may threaten Japan's future supplies of energy.
Last month Chinese President Hu Jintao and Russian President Vladimir Putin signed three communiques and issued a joint statement on "A New 21st Century World Order."
Saru
August 2, 2005
7:15 pm
Who needs the IMF when you've got SCAP!
IJ
August 3, 2005
8:04 am
From "The 'Great Game' Heats Up in Central Asia":http://www.pinr.com/:
"The international community should establish an economic and trade regime that is comprehensive and widely accepted and that operates through the means of holding negotiations on an equal footing, discarding the practice of applying pressure and sanctions to coerce unilateral economic concessions, and bringing into play the roles of global and regional multilateral organizations and mechanisms."
Saru
August 3, 2005
3:48 pm
shakuhachi
August 4, 2005
5:27 am
When you look at it this way, the Japanese didnt have a choice. Could you imagine any Japanese politicians wanting to be the ones that went down in the history books as being the one that gave up the Japanese empire? At the time, Japanese politicians were also being murdered by the extremist clique that wanted empire at any cost.
Jing
August 4, 2005
12:41 pm
somercet
August 4, 2005
1:23 pm
Saying "they found it impossible" means that the Japanese culture was too rigid and inflexible to find another way out, which is no one's fault but Japan's, as a whole nation.
Mutantfrog
August 5, 2005
4:39 am
Yes, the creation of their empire in East Asia was absolutely a choice, and one that the leaders deserved to be held accountable for. But it is true that by time that the attack on Pearl Harbor was being planned the empire had become completely unsustainable. Since the US was blocking their fuel supply lines, they thought that destroying the Naval base in Hawaii would cripple the ability of the US to control the Pacific.
In retrospect it seems to us like a completely insane act by the Japanese military, but they must have counted on Nazi Germany putting up a more formidable fight and keeping the US in a two-front war. If Germany had lasted longer and the US did not have the luxury of focusing the bulk of their efforts on the Pacific War then the outcome may have been different.
ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » War-time Japan
August 7, 2005
4:31 pm