Japan has lots of issues and scandals. We have only covered history books, wartime apologies, beef imports, gender relations, whaling, Article 9, so-called foreign criminals, and the beloved Jenkins. Above and beyond those are milk scandals, management crises, iron-triangle problems, mercury poisoning and a horde of other topics. But today we have the return of something that has been on the back burner for a while, and that is asbestos:
The Economist
… Although the World Health Organisation declared in 1980 that asbestos was a carcinogen, its use in construction was not banned in Japan until 2004, and a ban on all asbestos””?introduced in July””?will not come into effect until 2008. … The country lags decades behind other industrialised nations when it comes to containing the harmfulness of asbestos. All six regional Japan Railway (JR) companies created after privatisation in 1987 still use carriages insulated with asbestos. JR East has announced that it will decommission 90 of its 250 asbestos-containing carriages by 2006.
I remember reading about the ban in my morning Yomiuri in late 2004. I was shocked… how could it take them so long to come around? And now today:
JapanToday.com
The government was aware that inhaling even a small amount of asbestos could cause mesothelioma, a type of cancer, more than a decade before Japan started to control asbestos use in 1989, a 1978 report by a labor ministry expert panel obtained by Kyodo News on Monday showed.
It took them 26 years to ban something they knew could cause cancer?? WTFork! JapanPundits, please tell me what you think before I go off the deep end here.

Comments to this entry
RichL
July 27, 2005
2:20 am
Curzon
July 27, 2005
2:37 am
But remember also that lots of these so-called environmental/disease issues -- asbestos, dioxin, mad cow disease -- are in fact non-issues simply blown out of proportion by the media. Asbestos is fine as long as it is in an enclosed area. We encounter countless potentially harmful substances/things in our daily lives: freon, bleach, electricity, etc etc. As long as we're suitable insulated, we're fine. Ditto on asbestos. As long as its properly kept away from humans its a wonderful thing, a fire resistant insulator that keeps buildings warm. In the isolated cases of asbestos coming into contact with humans, it's more an issue of construction negligence than manufacturer defect. "See here for more.":http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asbestos#Controversy
Hope that stopped you from going off the deep end ;)
Saru
July 27, 2005
5:19 am
Saru
July 27, 2005
1:47 pm
Plunge
July 27, 2005
2:09 pm
This was discussed on some show Discover channel when talking about the worldtrade center and how the floors that had some kind of asbestos fire wall stuff lasted longer than floors built later on that didn't. I need to find that show again, it was interesting.
heirabbit
July 28, 2005
11:29 am