Entry details

Younghusband
Author

Younghusband

Date

July 19th, 2005

Tags

Comments

11 Comments so far.
Add yours.

5GW

Mark of Zenpundit and Dan of tdaxp have been having a brilliant brainstorming session on the possibilities of graduating 4th Generation Warfare (4GW) to a new level. So far these are the posts to watch:

Here is a taste:

A strong possibility exists that given successive generations of warfare tend to drive ” deeper” into enemy territory, that 5GW will mean systemic liquidation of enemy networks and their sympathizers, essentially a total war on a society or subsection of a society. There is no where ” deeper” for 5GW to go but here. At the high tech end 5GW would be precisely targeted to winnow out ” the bad guys” in a souped-up version of Operation Phoenix but at the low-tech end we could see campaigns that would be indiscriminate, democidally-oriented death squad campaigns that shred 4GW networks by the same actuarially merciless logic that led the Allies to firebomb German and Japanese cities in WWII.
…The 4th Generation of War redshifts deeper into the OODA loop. It slides into the “Observation” realm. If traditional war centered on an enemy’s physical strength, and 4GW on his moral strength, the 5th Generation of War would focus on his intellectual strength. A 5th Generation War might be fought with one side not knowing who it is fighting. Or even, a brilliantly executed 5GW might involve one side being completely ignorant that there ever was a war. It’s like the old question of what was the perfect robbery: we will never know, because in a perfect robbery the bank would not know that it was robbed.

Very interesting stuff.

Comments to this entry

Curtis Gale Weeks
July 19, 2005
7:15 pm
I wonder if they're familiar with the concept of "unrestricted warfare" first conceived by Chinese Colonels Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui in 1999, which includes: terrorism, economic & diplomatic warfare, computer hackers, and other unconventional warfare.

A couple links:

"Jane's Intelligence Review":http://www.janes.com/regional_news/asia_pacific/news/jir/jir000223_1_n.shtml

"Global Security. org":http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1999/WEBRES4.htm

_[I edited that link for you Curtis. - Younghusband]_
mark safranski
July 19, 2005
8:31 pm
Curtis ( and YH)

Thank you for these links !!!

Yes, I have heard about the concept though I have not seen a translation of their work ( and actually half-forgot it to be frank).

What I can tell you is that these Chinese Colonels sparked a classified course in Aysmmetric Warfare concepts at the request of the DoD at ( I believe) National Defense U. The prof who developed the course asked to use some material I had posted on H-Net to which I agreed. Unfortunately she was not permitted to share the syllabus or course material with me - so I'm not sure exactly what or how my ideas were interpreted or in what context other than asymmetric warfare by China was suddenly a very big concern for the pentagon at the time.

Thank you. This was a topic I really ought to have pursued at the time and never did. The reminder was useful !
Kenneth
July 19, 2005
11:31 pm
Intriguing. However, I foresee the emergence of entirely decentralized mass movements in the coming decades resulting from severe cultural dislocation. Quite simply, a "cause" may consist of many individual groups with no overarching coordination or even communication, each working to the advancement of the cause, ie, radical Islam, some other politico-religious movement, ect. That is how I envision 21st century warfare: completely decentralized. Robert D. Kaplan mentioned in the first chapter of _The Coming Anarchy_ that these wars "will ripple across continents with no discernible pattern" or something to that effect. Logically the only way for this to happen is what I described above.
Dan
July 20, 2005
1:41 am
Younghusband

I could thank you for your kind words and links on the blog, and apologize for not being able focus my thoughts today on a worth-while reply,

I could mention something about India's Prime Minister speaking to a joint session of Congress

or Bush's new Supreme Court pick

or even al Qaeda in Iraq convertting to Barnettian strategy

but instead....

the most important news in the history of humanity...


TDAXP IS ON TECHNORATI'S FRONT PAGE

!!!111!!!
tdaxp
July 20, 2005
1:25 pm
OODA Loop as Flowchart, Try 2

Earlier, in a post picked up by Coming Anarchy, ZenPundit, and others, I attempted to reconstruct the OODA Loop as a flowchart. You may remember I drew it like this:   Since that post, I have been in an email conversation with an expert on O...
Dan
July 21, 2005
1:27 am
I see dead people.

oops.

Not dead people. 5GWs. Yeah. That's it.

/ end self-promotion
Kenneth
July 21, 2005
3:46 am
Rigourous.
heirabbit
July 21, 2005
11:27 am
I'm still not clear on what the key difference is between 4GW and 5GW. I thought 4GW's main feature was that the enemy has no discernable organization, and that they fight with whatever means available. What you guys are saying about 5GW really sounds more like a W 4.1.
Dan
July 21, 2005
12:47 pm
4GW requires the attacker to have a politically mobilized population and the attacker's goal is to destroy the enemy's will to resist.

However, a politically mobilized population makes 5GW more difficult and 5GW attackers have no need to attack an enemy's will.
PurpleSlog » Blog Archive » 5GW Reply and Intro to ThunderPig and other stuff
May 30, 2006
7:23 am
[...] http://www.cominganarchy.com/?p=894 [...]
5GW Link Spotting: Baudrillard’s Bastard - “hackers, power grids, and (dis)information” « PurpleSlog
January 23, 2008
12:53 am
[...] and (dis)information. Virilio’s theory suggests that in an information war (one tactic of 5GW), the dominate form of 21st-century warfare, “information and disinformation have become [...]