Entry details

Chirol
Author

Chirol

Date

June 23rd, 2005

Tags

,

Comments

5 Comments so far.
Add yours.

Bad Day for Turkey

It’s been a rough day for Turkey. According to the German language Tagesschau (haven’t seen it elsewhere), police shot and killed one demonstrator in the south eastern province of Van. Additionally, 5 civilians and two journalists were wounded. The protestors wanted several two Kurdish PKK members, killed recently by Turkish forces and buried anonymously, to be exhumed and buried in a place designated by the family. Protestors were on the way to a cemetary when the police stopped them. They then proceeded to throw stones at the police who responded with tear gas, shots in the air and a few direct shots into the crowd. Things like this only fuel the fire of those in Europe who oppose Turkey’s joining.And speaking of which…

EU: European Citizens’ Petition Opposes Turkey in EU

A petition drive aimed at stopping Turkey’s EU aspirations has begun in several European countries. Organizers of the “Voice for Europe” campaign say their goal is to collect at least 1 million signatures urging Europe’s politicians not to begin membership talks with Ankara. Leaders of the initiative say they are not financed by any political party and have no affiliation with any nationalist or extremist organizations. They say they are ordinary citizens who simply believe Turkey does not belong in the EU, and they want Brussels to take notice.

The petition reads:

We, the undersigned citizens of the European Union, with the aim of supporting and contributing to European integration and protecting European values:

a) Resolutely oppose the intention of our national governments gathered in the European Council, and that of the European Commission to enlarge the European Union with the Republic of Turkey.

b) Urge our national governments and EU institutions not to open negotiations for Turkeys accession to the EU.

Addressed to the European Parliament, European Council, Council of the EU, European Commission, governments of the member states and national parliaments.

So far, according to the website, there are 21,000 signatures, a number which is sure to grow. Why do they oppose Turkey’s membership, REFL tell us:

…Turkey’s EU membership is based on economic as well as political, geographic and cultural grounds. He says Turkey is too big and poor to be absorbed by the EU. If it joined, it would be the bloc’s largest member. He also notes that only 3 percent of Turkey’s territory lies in Europe and argues that Turkish society and its politicians do not share the continent’s values or its stability.

All good points, however I would argue Turkey doesn’t not share the same values, but rather shares many but not all of them. With Europe plunged into an identity crisis, this is not the kind of news that bodes well for Turkey especially considering that Chirac’s government is a bit shakey and German Chancellor Schröder won’t be around much longer. The German opposition opposes membership for Turkey and instead is calling for a “privledged partnership” which the Turks reject. Voice of Europe also proposes something similar claiming it is no different than what the Swiss and Norwegians have, forgetting of course that they don’t want to join and Turkey does.

Now is the time for a serious debate on the identity of Europe and the EU. Thus far it has only been informally defined. Questions about new members don’t extend only to Turkey but also to the Ukraine for example, which now politically has a much better chance. However, on the ground, how European is the Ukraine? Most would consider it far more Russian than European. I invite readers, especially European ones, to offer their thoughts on the identity of the EU? Should it be based more on culture and history like individual cultures in Europe are, or rather primarily on sharing the same ideas such as in the American model?

Comments to this entry

Dr. Alfred Russel Wallace
June 24, 2005
3:51 am
Although no longer a European (is Great Britain part of Europe?], I think your last question is deeper than it seems at first glance. Should a community be based on shared culture or shared ideals? [I prefer ideals to ideas...] The simple answer is that old-fashioned nation states are based on both, with a lot of emphasis on culture. But which is more important as nations evolve??? I hope its ideals.....
Chirol
June 24, 2005
1:51 pm
Indeed. I would argue the US was originally based on ideals and of course over time developed its own unique culture. However, what makes America so appealing to foreigners and so successful is that outsiders are easily integrated because the only real requirement is sharing the same ideals about the "American Way"

European countries were all originally based on culture/language/history and with the birth of the EU, are only now starting to talk about ideals. Of course, individual countries are indeed based on ideals (Germany especially so after WWII) but the culture is stronger. How can the EU work with that? What are "European Ideals?" Can Europeans even agree? I highly doubt it.
ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » Yet Another Bad Day for Turkey
July 2, 2005
1:03 pm
[...] Arnie Angers AnkaraA Canadian, Based in Romania, Currently In TurkeyAnatolian Dispatch #6: “Bestseller”Travel Plans ConfirmedBad Day for Turkey [...]
ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » Testing Turkish Democracy
September 1, 2005
4:04 pm
[...] While both Curzon and I don’t consider what happened to the Armenians genocide, it is indeed a topic that must be dealt with openly so it can be put aside. The same goes for the Kurdish insurgency as well as Cyprus. Considering the Turks have been jumping through fiery hoops to get into the EU, they’ve sure gone and shot themselves in the foot….again. Yet, though many see this as a setback for Turkey, a little perspective is in order. This is merely a small bump on the road to democracy and surely no one expects little things like this not to creep up now and again. The numerous reforms Turkey has passed aren’t worth the paper they’re written on to Europeans nor the world in general. Though they garnered lots of publicity, it is rather events like these which will put Turkey and her new reforms to the test. [...]
ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » Why in Cyprus and not in Turkey
December 11, 2006
2:02 pm
[...] While Turkey and the EU spar over Cyprus, the Kurds are busy taking advantage of a golden opportunity. Linking Turkish minority rights in Cyprus with Kurdish minority rights in Turkey is brilliant. Whether it will work is another question. On top of that, the question as to whether the Kurds will finally be able to found and maintain their own political party comes at a critical time for Ankara who’s busy fending of lawsuits against famous authors and trying to keep police from beating unarmed protesters. Although the Turkish state was founded on a kind of ethnocentric nationalist paranoia, now is likely the best opportunity for the Kurds to reassert themselves. And with a possibly independent Kurdish state in Iraq, Ankara may want to think about creating a few stakeholders in the Turkish state. What say you? [...]