Entry details

Chirol
Author

Chirol

Date

May 26th, 2005

Tags

, ,

Comments

13 Comments so far.
Add yours.

Schröder out the door?

As some ComingAnarchy readers might know, important elections were held in Germany a few days ago in the state of Nordrhein-Westfalen. It is Germany’s most populous state, most industrialized state and also the state with the highest unemployment rate with over a million people unemployed. The Social Democrats or SPD, haven’t lost an election in NRW in about 40 years and thus this comes as a serious yet expected blow.

Once the result of the elections were decisive, current chancellor of Germany, Gerhard Schröder, issued the following statement:

Deswegen halte er es für seine Pflicht und Verantwortung, “darauf hinzuwirken dass der Herr Bundespräsident von den Möglichkeiten des Grundgesetzes Gebrauch machen kann, um so rasch wie möglich – also realistischerweise für den Herbst dieses Jahres – Neuwahlen zum Deutschen Bundestag herbeizuführen”.

Your translation courtesy of Chirol:

Therefore he holds it as his duty and responsibility “to work towards the possibilities of the constitution for the Federal President to call new elections for the Bundestag as fast as possible, realistically in Autumn of this year”

Here are short party descriptions and their position in Germany (i.e. the right/left here is very different from in the US):

CDU – Christian Democratic Union, opposition party (right)
SPD – Party of Chancellor Schröder, ruling with the Greens (center-left)
Grüne (Greens) – Currently in a ruling coalition with the SPD (left)
FDP – Free Democratic Party (right)

The controversy is a bit unusual for non-Germans. It came as no surprise that the SPD lost NRW however what got so many Germans up in arms was the fact that Schröder essentially chose the date of the new elections himself. By law, only the President can call elections but he is never forced to. If the president feels the current Chancellor lacks enough support to govern in the Bundestag then he can call for new ones. Yet, Schröder not only called for them himself, he also said when he wantd them to be (Autum) which outraged many people. The reason he did this was to give the opposition as little time as possible to organize, put together a coherent policy to sell to the German people, select candidates and thus provide the only chance of winning again as the SPD’s chances are already slim.

What does this mean for ComingAnarchy readers interested in foreign policy? Angela Merkel, head of the CDU (Christian Democratic Union) has long been pro-American and clashed with Schröder during the lead up to the war in Iraq. She will likely be the next Germany Chancelor. In 2003, she published an op-ed in the Washington Post entitled “Schroeder Doesn’t Speak for All Germans” (pdf version in German here). It begins:

Rarely do we have the experience of witnessing firsthand the end of one epoch and the beginning of another. But this is exactly what people all over the world are now living through. This epochal
change began with the fall of the Berlin Wall on Nov. 9, 1989, which marked a victory for freedom and the opening of the transatlantic partnership to the East. It continued with the events of Sept. 11, 2001, which shook the United States to its very foundations—with consequences that, to this day, many Europeans have not fully grasped. [emphasis mine]. Because of these decisive events, Europe and the United States now must redefine the nucleus of their domestic, foreign and security policy principles.

Light Bulb! A European politican who gets it! She continues:

But the history of Germany and Europe in the 20th century in particular certainly teaches us this: that while military force cannot be the normal continuation of politics by other means, it must never be ruled out, or even merely questioned—as has been done by the German federal government—as the ultimate means of dealing with dictators. Anyone who rejects military action as a last resort weakens the pressure that needs to be maintained on dictators and consequently makes a war not less but more likely.[emphasis mine]

Sing it sister! Si vis pacem, para bellum!

All in all, things are looking up for German-American relations today. While German public opinion is not only anti-US, but extremely so, a new government would help to begin changing that. While nobody should expect to see German troops in Iraq ever, Germany and the US would be able to work together again on other issues such as Iran, North Korea and the arms embargo on China. The only snag is that the CDU doesn’t support Turkey’s EU membership whereas the US and SPD do. Smooth sailing may be on the horizon. I’ll be keeping everyone updated as things progress here in Germany.

For More:

Are Germany and the US Heading for a Thaw?(Spiegel in English)
Schroeder: Lose the Vote to Win the Election (Spiegel in English)
Germany ‘set for early election’
Schröder sieht Basis für Reformpolitik entzogen, verlangt Neuwahlen
Schröder: “Keine Basis mehr für Reformen”
SPD will Bundestagswahl noch in diesem Herbst

Comments to this entry

Grendel
May 26, 2005
5:26 pm
Welcome back online :-)
I had a little bit time on sunday and followed the elections pretty closely, if you're interested, take a "look":http://grabic.blogspot.com/ Chancellor Schröder didn't actually have an alternative after the outcome of the election in NRW.

The FDP is not actually a right / conservative party per se - while they tend to have more similarities with the CDU, they do form coalitions with the SPD as well (catchword Ampelkoalition), the "Liberals" tend towards the CDU since the early 80ies thoughs. Before that, they switched sides between CDU and SPD quite often.

While German public opinion is not only anti-US,...

So, let's differentiate generalizations a little bit. My impression is rather the public opinion is anti-US-government, but impressions are never representative. I agree polls were bad during the Iraq War, the Europeans have to work closer with the Americans thought some 31%, while 52% saw a neccessity to walk another path (politicly). Also, during the same period, 40% said that there's an Anti-American sentiment, while the same number of people said there's none. The reason for the first 40% were almost exclusively the Iraq War controversy. (source KAS, which has close ties to the CDU). Or take a look at this "graph":http://www.kas.de/upload/bilder/faz/freundschaft.jpg If you're curious about what influenced German people's view on the US most, take a look "here":http://www.kas.de/upload/bilder/faz/amerika_bild.jpg

...a new government would help to begin changing that.

Which is probably true for the US (and modifications in their foreign policy) as well. ;-)

While nobody should expect to see German troops in Iraq ever,...

One problem with the war was that it broke international law and was completely illegal, sending troops there without consent of the UNO would have been impossible (even if the government would have wanted to send them).

...but I agree with you that the new government (and it's very, very likely that the CDU will take over in Germany, anything else would be a wonder for Chancellor Schröder) shouldn't reject Turkey full membership in the long run, geopolitically that's such a grave mistake.
Chief Wiggum
May 26, 2005
8:47 pm
From Mark Steyn's article in The Spectator-
http://www.spectator.co.uk/article.php?id=6168&issue=2005-05-28

"The electors of North Rhine-Westphalia certainly understand the nature of the times in which they live. If it were just a matter of kicking Gerhard Schröder's sorry ass around the room, I'd be all in favour of last Sunday's election result. But, in fact, voters in the Ruhr were punishing his party for their temerity in proposing even a teensy-weensy, tentative, tepid reform of their arthritic welfare state. They may have ended four decades of SPD rule, but they did so in order to vote against change. The Christian Democrats and Liberal Democrats are merely passing beneficiaries of the electorate's determination to live in denial for as long as they can get away with it. It was a vote for the present tense, a vote to say to the moment linger awhile, another decade or three."
Chirol
May 26, 2005
10:15 pm
Grendel: I would say German opinion is pretty anti-US policy and anti-US in general and I have a lot of unfortunate personal experience to back this up. While I don't think every single person dislikes Americans and American foreign policy, being an American, the first people want to tell you these days are what they think about the States: we are superficial, stupid, don't know geography, etc. These are the most frequent ones you hear. Of course, all these people have never been to America, don't study history, politics or sociology and have no clue what they're talking about, yet the most disturbing trend is this: In Germany, if one were to say "I think all Indians are stupid, or superficial, or they have no culture," everyone would be shocked and think you're a neo nazi or on the extreme right. Say the exact same thing about the US and it's suddenly not only acceptable but fashionable.
Curzon
May 27, 2005
7:42 am
Grendel: Regardless of your incorrect jurisprudence ("One problem with the war was that it broke international law and was completely illegal"), would Germany send troops if the current government of Iraq requested it? No matter how you slice it the answer is that they would not. Case closed.

Chirol: Do I take it you would vote for the CDU if you were German? Does that conflict with your theological views? How about the Lady Chirol, who is, I assume, a German citizen?
Chirol
May 27, 2005
8:24 am
Curzon: I would, but for the sole reason that I think it'd be the choice most beneficial to the US.
Grendel
May 27, 2005
9:41 am
Chirol: Since you're making statements regarding Germany and Germans as a whole, using personal experience as an example is fine, but generalizations and stereotyping are not. Imho, you're making the same mistake the people you met. What I try to explain is that there's a difference between (valid) subjective, personal experience and representativeness (which is one aim of welldone surveys), and your post was missing the latter.

Curzon: Please explain in what way the Iraq war was in compliance with international law? As to your valid question, you didn't search for information about it I presume. The German Bundeswehr currently has enganged in activies in Bosnia and Herzegowina, Kosovo, Georgia, Afghanistan and Uzbekistan, Athiopia and Eritrea, Cap Horn and Indonesia with over 7,000 troops. Please note that those are only the international engagements. There's only so much you can do, and the US for example already experience the boundaries of their own, in comparison far more extensive military capabilities. Germany's Bundeswehr has a far smaller standing army (not mentioning the structural reform it is undergoing) and is a conscript army, too - with the usual impact on its utilisability. In the case of Iraq, the government *did* ask Germany for help, and indeed they do get it. Low-profile enough to be overlooked, I have to concede, but you can read about it "here":http://www.bmvg.de/C1256F1200608B1B/CurrentBaseLink/N268RHPX205MMISDE

So, to say that Germany doesn't do anything at all is wrong as well, but then again, you have to look for the information first before stating a black-and-white situation and the case closed. Just my two euro-cents.
Curzon
May 27, 2005
10:36 am
Two very valuable 2 euro cents, thanks. Iraq war legal? I'll write a memo this weekend.
Curzon
May 27, 2005
11:57 am
How would you have voted in the EU constitution? How did Ms. Chirol vote? And how would she vote in the September election? surely she won't vote America's interests...
Chirol
May 27, 2005
6:34 pm
Curzon: I personally don't know enough about the EU constitution to give you a valid response. Haven't been Following it. However, I'm also not sure whether a stronger EU or a weaker EU would benefit the US more as there are many advantages and disadvantages of both.

As for Lady Chirol, she's indepedent and doesn't always vote along party lines so it's hard to say. She's also not particularly interested in politics =(
ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » Bon Voyage Chirac?
May 30, 2005
8:09 am
[...] . We’ll have to wait on France. And in case anyone forgot, this is America’s second blessing in less than a week as Germany’s Schröder is [...]
ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » Consquences of French NO
June 1, 2005
8:37 am
[...] to forge new ties with individual European states now before they can regroup. As noted in this previous post, that chance may be at hand for Germany. We also need [...]
ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » CDU Ahead
June 2, 2005
7:17 pm
[...] uo; Family Ties Related Let the Race BeginJapan’s Military ShiftSchröder out [...]
ComingAnarchy.com » Blog Archive » German Political Gossip
June 6, 2005
9:16 pm
[...] ear old Russian orphan last year with this 45 year old (and fourth) wife. Thus, after the recent elections and their implications, he’s decided he’s h [...]