<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nuke Pyongyang,&#160;Reconsidered</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cominganarchy.com/2005/05/04/second-take/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/05/04/second-take/</link>
	<description>Speak Victorian, Think Pagan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:41:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chirol</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/05/04/second-take/comment-page-1/#comment-5768</link>
		<dc:creator>Chirol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 20:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/05/03/second-take/#comment-5768</guid>
		<description>It seems someone&#039;s been listening to you Curzon:


&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/getarticle.pl5?nn20050502a3.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;U.S. may allow nuke strikes over WMD&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;i&gt;WASHINGTON (Kyodo) The U.S. military is considering allowing regional combatant commanders to request presidential approval for pre-emptive nuclear strikes against possible attacks with weapons of mass destruction on the United States or its allies, according to a draft nuclear operations paper.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems someone&#8217;s been listening to you Curzon:</p>


<p><a href="http://www.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/getarticle.pl5?nn20050502a3.htm"><span class="caps">U.S. </span>may allow nuke strikes over <span class="caps">WMD</span></a></p>

<p><i><span class="caps">WASHINGTON </span>(Kyodo) The <span class="caps">U.S. </span>military is considering allowing regional combatant commanders to request presidential approval for pre-emptive nuclear strikes against possible attacks with weapons of mass destruction on the United States or its allies, according to a draft nuclear operations paper.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdaxp</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/05/04/second-take/comment-page-1/#comment-5556</link>
		<dc:creator>tdaxp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 02:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/05/03/second-take/#comment-5556</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Coming Anarchy on Slate&lt;/strong&gt;

Lord Curzon messages me to say that his article promoting pre-emptive nuclear obliteration of Pyongyang was mentioned in Slate.  Congrats!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Coming Anarchy on Slate</strong></p>

<p>Lord Curzon messages me to say that his article promoting pre-emptive nuclear obliteration of Pyongyang was mentioned in Slate.  Congrats!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dusty</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/05/04/second-take/comment-page-1/#comment-5547</link>
		<dc:creator>Dusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 19:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/05/03/second-take/#comment-5547</guid>
		<description>I did some googling and think it was Jaques Chirac, not Vladimir Putin on the quote.  :-)  Be back later!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did some googling and think it was Jaques Chirac, not Vladimir Putin on the quote.  :-)  Be back later!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/05/04/second-take/comment-page-1/#comment-5530</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 14:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/05/03/second-take/#comment-5530</guid>
		<description>Ah, yes.  Thank you for the link.  I was worried there was some hidden 1977-1981 policy I did not know about.

Mr. Carter&#039;s unique foreign policies don&#039;t do the nation much good.  (Unlike constructive former Presidents, such as Bush and Clinton.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, yes.  Thank you for the link.  I was worried there was some hidden 1977-1981 policy I did not know about.</p>

<p>Mr. Carter&#8217;s unique foreign policies don&#8217;t do the nation much good.  (Unlike constructive former Presidents, such as Bush and Clinton.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saru</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/05/04/second-take/comment-page-1/#comment-5526</link>
		<dc:creator>Saru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 13:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/05/03/second-take/#comment-5526</guid>
		<description>For the record, and before any untoward remarks are made here or elsewhere about my person, I do not advocate nuking Israel. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, and before any untoward remarks are made here or elsewhere about my person, I do not advocate nuking Israel.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curzon</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/05/04/second-take/comment-page-1/#comment-5524</link>
		<dc:creator>Curzon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 13:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/05/03/second-take/#comment-5524</guid>
		<description>Carter unilaterally went to North Korea in 1994 and undermined Clinton&#039;s negotiations and opportunity to premptively strike. For more info, watch &quot;this great PBS program.&quot;:http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/kim/view/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carter unilaterally went to North Korea in 1994 and undermined Clinton&#8217;s negotiations and opportunity to premptively strike. For more info, watch <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/kim/view/">this great <span class="caps">PBS </span>program.</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/05/04/second-take/comment-page-1/#comment-5523</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 13:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/05/03/second-take/#comment-5523</guid>
		<description>I realize that Jimmy Carter is history&#039;s greatest monster, but how did he influence the stability of North Korea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize that Jimmy Carter is history&#8217;s greatest monster, but how did he influence the stability of North Korea?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillyBob</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/05/04/second-take/comment-page-1/#comment-5522</link>
		<dc:creator>BillyBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 12:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/05/03/second-take/#comment-5522</guid>
		<description>Just don&#039;t forget what we&#039;re up against

&quot;Worse then 1g84&quot;:http://slate.com/id/2117846/

by Hitchins

&lt;blockquote&gt;Kim Jong-il and his fellow slave masters are trying to dictate the pace of events by setting a timetable of nuclearization, based on a crash program wrung from their human property. But why should it be assumed that their failed state and society are permanent? Another timeline, oriented to liberation and regime change, is what the dynasty most fears. It should start to fear it more. Bravo to President Bush, anyway, for his bluntness.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just don&#8217;t forget what we&#8217;re up against</p>

<p><a href="http://slate.com/id/2117846/">Worse then 1g84</a></p>

<p>by Hitchins</p>

<blockquote>Kim Jong-il and his fellow slave masters are trying to dictate the pace of events by setting a timetable of nuclearization, based on a crash program wrung from their human property. But why should it be assumed that their failed state and society are permanent? Another timeline, oriented to liberation and regime change, is what the dynasty most fears. It should start to fear it more. Bravo to President Bush, anyway, for his bluntness.</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
