<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Year of Korea-Japan&#160;Friendship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cominganarchy.com/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/</link>
	<description>Speak Victorian, Think Pagan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:24:32 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ComingAnarchy.com  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; The Face of Diplomatic War</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/comment-page-1/#comment-8090</link>
		<dc:creator>ComingAnarchy.com  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; The Face of Diplomatic War</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/#comment-8090</guid>
		<description>[...] less charade: Koizumi invited Roh to visit Japan later this year.  	Three cheers for 2005, the year of Japan-Korea Friendship!  President Roh, I knew y [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] less charade: Koizumi invited Roh to visit Japan later this year.  	Three cheers for 2005, the year of Japan-Korea Friendship!  President Roh, I knew y [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ComingAnarchy.com  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187;</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/comment-page-1/#comment-5614</link>
		<dc:creator>ComingAnarchy.com  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 16:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/#comment-5614</guid>
		<description>[...]  to &quot;&gt; 						 			 					Putin not to apologise for Soviet occupation of Baltic states  	Reports are coming in that the Lithuanians are immolating th [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  to &#8220;&gt; 						 			 					Putin not to apologise for Soviet occupation of Baltic states  	Reports are coming in that the Lithuanians are immolating th [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ComingAnarchy.com  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Apples and Oranges</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/comment-page-1/#comment-3373</link>
		<dc:creator>ComingAnarchy.com  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Apples and Oranges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2005 21:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/#comment-3373</guid>
		<description>[...] cendents of the victims?  Unacceptable!  This gets to my main point, ladies and gentlemen: the actual apology is irrelevant.  Koizumi could apologize a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] cendents of the victims?  Unacceptable!  This gets to my main point, ladies and gentlemen: the actual apology is irrelevant.  Koizumi could apologize a [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdaxp</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/comment-page-1/#comment-2061</link>
		<dc:creator>tdaxp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 23:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/#comment-2061</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Asia Realigned?&lt;/strong&gt;

&quot;Focus of Indo-Japan relation should be FDI-based: Kamal Nath,&quot; Navhind Times, 17 March 2005, http://www.navhindtimes.com/stories.php?part=news&amp;Story_ID=03179.

&quot;Brazil, Germany, India, Japan Accelerate U.N Reform,&quot; China View, 23 March 2005, htt...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Asia Realigned?</strong></p>

<p>&#8220;Focus of Indo-Japan relation should be <span class="caps">FDI</span>-based: Kamal Nath,&#8221; Navhind Times, 17 March 2005, <a href="http://www.navhindtimes.com/stories.php?part=news&amp;Story_ID=03179">http://www.navhindtimes.com/stories.php?part=news&amp;Story_ID=03179</a>.</p>

<p>&#8220;Brazil, Germany, India, Japan Accelerate <span class="caps">U.N</span> Reform,&#8221; China View, 23 March 2005, htt&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdaxp</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/comment-page-1/#comment-2060</link>
		<dc:creator>tdaxp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 23:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/#comment-2060</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Asia Realigned?&lt;/strong&gt;

&quot;Focus of Indo-Japan relation should be FDI-based: Kamal Nath,&quot; Navhind Times, 17 March 2005, http://www.navhindtimes.com/stories.php?part=news&amp;Story_ID=03179.

&quot;Brazil, Germany, India, Japan Accelerate U.N Reform,&quot; China View, 23 March 2005, htt...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Asia Realigned?</strong></p>

<p>&#8220;Focus of Indo-Japan relation should be <span class="caps">FDI</span>-based: Kamal Nath,&#8221; Navhind Times, 17 March 2005, <a href="http://www.navhindtimes.com/stories.php?part=news&amp;Story_ID=03179">http://www.navhindtimes.com/stories.php?part=news&amp;Story_ID=03179</a>.</p>

<p>&#8220;Brazil, Germany, India, Japan Accelerate <span class="caps">U.N</span> Reform,&#8221; China View, 23 March 2005, htt&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adamu</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/comment-page-1/#comment-2053</link>
		<dc:creator>Adamu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/#comment-2053</guid>
		<description>Hey guys, did you know the real English name for Dokdo/Takeshima is the Liancourt Rocks? Check out Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liancourt_Rocks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys, did you know the real English name for Dokdo/Takeshima is the Liancourt Rocks? Check out Wiki: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liancourt_Rocks">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liancourt_Rocks</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adamu</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/comment-page-1/#comment-2052</link>
		<dc:creator>Adamu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/#comment-2052</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have anything really new to add, but I have to hand it to Japan: they&#039;re handling this beautifully. To Japan, the issue has been settled for a long time -- they proposed international arbitration on the matter some 50 years ago. So why not support some holiday designated by a prefecture? -- they claim the island is theirs for some fairly solid reasons. That the Japanese government can knowingly fan ugly Korean nationalist chest-beating while promising to &quot;restore trust&quot; in the Japan-ROK relationship is quite a political coup, indeed. Nobody can say Japan lacks an effective foreign policy in this case. 

I agree with Saru: Korea should just back off and make some lame official statement to keep the status quo. Imagine what the next step could be: mass protesting at the Aichi Expo? A combination of zainichi and no-visa Korean tourists could make for quite a crowd. Neither government wants to see that. 

And anyway, despite all the idiotic protesters cutting their fingers off, this isn&#039;t even the most important island dispute that Japan is dealing with. The Senkaku Islands have a much bigger potential to turn into something ugly. Saru: hurry up and write that paper! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have anything really new to add, but I have to hand it to Japan: they&#8217;re handling this beautifully. To Japan, the issue has been settled for a long time &#8212; they proposed international arbitration on the matter some 50 years ago. So why not support some holiday designated by a prefecture? &#8212; they claim the island is theirs for some fairly solid reasons. That the Japanese government can knowingly fan ugly Korean nationalist chest-beating while promising to &#8220;restore trust&#8221; in the Japan-ROK relationship is quite a political coup, indeed. Nobody can say Japan lacks an effective foreign policy in this case. </p>

<p>I agree with Saru: Korea should just back off and make some lame official statement to keep the status quo. Imagine what the next step could be: mass protesting at the Aichi Expo? A combination of zainichi and no-visa Korean tourists could make for quite a crowd. Neither government wants to see that. </p>

<p>And anyway, despite all the idiotic protesters cutting their fingers off, this isn&#8217;t even the most important island dispute that Japan is dealing with. The Senkaku Islands have a much bigger potential to turn into something ugly. Saru: hurry up and write that paper!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curzon</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/comment-page-1/#comment-2043</link>
		<dc:creator>Curzon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/#comment-2043</guid>
		<description>The ambassador did his job and restated his government&#039;s position, that Japan has not given up their claim to the island despite Korea chucking them off fifty years ago.  Setting aside my support for Koizumi&#039;s Yasukuni visits, Roh&#039;s latest hardline speech looks anything but strong: he looks like baby throwing a tantrum.  

And the biggest question is, why do Roh and his ilk don&#039;t say a word about North Korean and the evil Kim Jong Il but bitch and moan at every chance they get about Korea&#039;s friends.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ambassador did his job and restated his government&#8217;s position, that Japan has not given up their claim to the island despite Korea chucking them off fifty years ago.  Setting aside my support for Koizumi&#8217;s Yasukuni visits, Roh&#8217;s latest hardline speech looks anything but strong: he looks like baby throwing a tantrum.  </p>

<p>And the biggest question is, why do Roh and his ilk don&#8217;t say a word about North Korean and the evil Kim Jong Il but bitch and moan at every chance they get about Korea&#8217;s friends.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/comment-page-1/#comment-2042</link>
		<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 10:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/#comment-2042</guid>
		<description>why does everyone casually ignore the fact that the japanese ambassador to korea made the same claim as the shimane prefecture.  in effect, making it a statement of the national government and not just some hobunk town full of hicks.  korea is responding as japan knew that it would, with the same emotional reactions that it always responds to in a case like this.  it&#039;s clear to me that the japanese government incited this latest round of problems on purpose. for what ends who knows.

as for roh&#039;s latest hardline speech, i see it as no different in spirit from koizumi starting to visit the shrine some years back.  it&#039;s an appeal to look strong and nationalist.  you may call koizumi&#039;s method more subtle but in effect it&#039;s always been about being able to quietly say f-you to china and korea to give service to those at home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why does everyone casually ignore the fact that the japanese ambassador to korea made the same claim as the shimane prefecture.  in effect, making it a statement of the national government and not just some hobunk town full of hicks.  korea is responding as japan knew that it would, with the same emotional reactions that it always responds to in a case like this.  it&#8217;s clear to me that the japanese government incited this latest round of problems on purpose. for what ends who knows.</p>

<p>as for roh&#8217;s latest hardline speech, i see it as no different in spirit from koizumi starting to visit the shrine some years back.  it&#8217;s an appeal to look strong and nationalist.  you may call koizumi&#8217;s method more subtle but in effect it&#8217;s always been about being able to quietly say f-you to china and korea to give service to those at home.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saru</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/comment-page-1/#comment-2027</link>
		<dc:creator>Saru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 00:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/#comment-2027</guid>
		<description>This horse has been beaten to death all over Asia blogs this past week, so I&#039;m not going to rehash what we can all read elsewhere, cite arcane historical tidbits, or type out some emotional polemic damning either side for their actions. 

I&#039;m also not touching your likening of the Japanese occupation of the Korean peninsula to &quot;rosewater,&quot; though I&#039;m sure Curzon, that you know me well enough to imagine my thoughts on this. 

That said, I will agree with you that the South Korean reaction to this has been, in my humble opinion, unnecessarily extreme. First of all, we&#039;re talking about Shimane Prefecture here. Get a map. It&#039;s Shimane. I&#039;m just guessing, but I would say that to most Japanese what matters more than the possession of these rocks is the sight of such firey South Korean behavior. That is certaily going to make a greater, and longer lasting negative impression.

Secondly, Koreans currently _occupy_ Dokdo/Takeshima. There is very little chance that Japan is going to use force to remove the Koreans, no matter how many backwater prefectures pass legislation commemorataing it. By all rights, it is Korea&#039;s (and the ICJ would probably agree, and since the Japanese are willing to go there over it, why not take them up on it and end this mess once and for all?) Raising such a stink over this only makes the situation worse because the Japanese, so far, have been wise enough not to take the bait. Instead, they respond with calm and measured moderation, which only makes the Koreans look even more extreme. It seems that Presidnet Roh has fallen into desparately using this issue to stoke anti-Japanese sentiment for his own political gain (and possibly in connection with the campaign to criticize and flush out people like Park, whose father was a &quot;collaborater&quot; with the Japanese). 

The judgement, of course, is his to make, but it&#039;s sad to see relations, which have been steadily improving according to the annual Japanese cabinet office poll, suffer over this. I should think that South Korea would be much better served if they just followed the Japanese example on this and just let the Foreign Ministry issue a statement declaring Dokdo as Korean territory, while letting spokesmen like Roh call publicly for a peaceful settlement. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This horse has been beaten to death all over Asia blogs this past week, so I&#8217;m not going to rehash what we can all read elsewhere, cite arcane historical tidbits, or type out some emotional polemic damning either side for their actions. </p>

<p>I&#8217;m also not touching your likening of the Japanese occupation of the Korean peninsula to &#8220;rosewater,&#8221; though I&#8217;m sure Curzon, that you know me well enough to imagine my thoughts on this. </p>

<p>That said, I will agree with you that the South Korean reaction to this has been, in my humble opinion, unnecessarily extreme. First of all, we&#8217;re talking about Shimane Prefecture here. Get a map. It&#8217;s Shimane. I&#8217;m just guessing, but I would say that to most Japanese what matters more than the possession of these rocks is the sight of such firey South Korean behavior. That is certaily going to make a greater, and longer lasting negative impression.</p>

<p>Secondly, Koreans currently <em>occupy</em> Dokdo/Takeshima. There is very little chance that Japan is going to use force to remove the Koreans, no matter how many backwater prefectures pass legislation commemorataing it. By all rights, it is Korea&#8217;s (and the <span class="caps">ICJ </span>would probably agree, and since the Japanese are willing to go there over it, why not take them up on it and end this mess once and for all?) Raising such a stink over this only makes the situation worse because the Japanese, so far, have been wise enough not to take the bait. Instead, they respond with calm and measured moderation, which only makes the Koreans look even more extreme. It seems that Presidnet Roh has fallen into desparately using this issue to stoke anti-Japanese sentiment for his own political gain (and possibly in connection with the campaign to criticize and flush out people like Park, whose father was a &#8220;collaborater&#8221; with the Japanese). </p>

<p>The judgement, of course, is his to make, but it&#8217;s sad to see relations, which have been steadily improving according to the annual Japanese cabinet office poll, suffer over this. I should think that South Korea would be much better served if they just followed the Japanese example on this and just let the Foreign Ministry issue a statement declaring Dokdo as Korean territory, while letting spokesmen like Roh call publicly for a peaceful settlement.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: umetaro</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/comment-page-1/#comment-2026</link>
		<dc:creator>umetaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 00:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/#comment-2026</guid>
		<description>Looks like Korea&#039;s in a lose-lose situation.

Minister Oh made clear, &quot;If we abrogate the Fisheries Agreement, our boats will no longer be able to fish in the Japanese EEZ, and it can bring about a collapse in near-sea fishing. We have fished 1.6 times more than the Japanese did in each other&#039;s EEZs since the 1999 Fisheries Agreement came into effect.&quot;

http://english.donga.com/srv/service.php3?bicode=020000&amp;biid=2005032256048

also speaking of denials...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/1599642.stm

and bribes...
http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200501/200501170044.html

The Korean government seems to have screwed the Korean people on that one.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Korea&#8217;s in a lose-lose situation.</p>

<p>Minister Oh made clear, &#8220;If we abrogate the Fisheries Agreement, our boats will no longer be able to fish in the Japanese <span class="caps">EEZ, </span>and it can bring about a collapse in near-sea fishing. We have fished 1.6 times more than the Japanese did in each other&#8217;s <span class="caps">EEZ</span>s since the 1999 Fisheries Agreement came into effect.&#8221;</p>

<p><a href="http://english.donga.com/srv/service.php3?bicode=020000&amp;biid=2005032256048" rel="nofollow">http://english.donga.com/srv/service.php3?bicode=020000&amp;biid=2005032256048</a></p>

<p>also speaking of denials&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/1599642.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/1599642.stm</a></p>

<p>and bribes&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200501/200501170044.html" rel="nofollow">http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200501/200501170044.html</a></p>

<p>The Korean government seems to have screwed the Korean people on that one.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asfdfa</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/comment-page-1/#comment-2019</link>
		<dc:creator>asfdfa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 22:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/#comment-2019</guid>
		<description>the island is more than an unhospitable rock ... to the koreans it is a national symbol (PATRIOTICAL SONGS PRAISING THE ISLAND) ... the victory over the first japanese naval invasion in which korea has won!  The war crimes Japan has caused to the Koreans are equivalent to the Nazi&#039;s &amp; the jews (JUST NOT RECOGNIZED - BUT NOT FORGOTTEN TO MANY KOREANS!)... Many KOREANS were murdered with unspeakable TORTURE ... Is it no wonder that Koreans are so extreme in their actions when Japan wants to take its land AGAIN? ... How will the Jews react if Germany tried to take a piece of Juerusalem ... And to spit on someone&#039;s wound - Japan denies its atrocities to the Koreans and bribe them with money ... To Japan Dokdo is just fish for food ... To KOREANS its a symbol ... They took advantage of us before ... KOREANS WILL BE DAMNDED IF THEY LET THEM TRY THAT AGAIN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the island is more than an unhospitable rock &#8230; to the koreans it is a national symbol (PATRIOTICAL <span class="caps">SONGS PRAISING THE ISLAND</span>) &#8230; the victory over the first japanese naval invasion in which korea has won!  The war crimes Japan has caused to the Koreans are equivalent to the Nazi&#8217;s &amp; the jews (JUST <span class="caps">NOT RECOGNIZED </span>- <span class="caps">BUT NOT FORGOTTEN</span> TO <span class="caps">MANY KOREANS</span>!)&#8230; Many <span class="caps">KOREANS </span>were murdered with unspeakable <span class="caps">TORTURE</span> &#8230; Is it no wonder that Koreans are so extreme in their actions when Japan wants to take its land <span class="caps">AGAIN</span>? &#8230; How will the Jews react if Germany tried to take a piece of Juerusalem &#8230; And to spit on someone&#8217;s wound &#8211; Japan denies its atrocities to the Koreans and bribe them with money &#8230; To Japan Dokdo is just fish for food &#8230; To <span class="caps">KOREANS </span>its a symbol &#8230; They took advantage of us before &#8230; <span class="caps">KOREANS WILL</span> BE <span class="caps">DAMNDED</span> IF <span class="caps">THEY LET THEM TRY THAT AGAIN</span>!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Marmot&#8217;s Hole  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; &#8216;Diplomatic war&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/comment-page-1/#comment-2004</link>
		<dc:creator>The Marmot&#8217;s Hole  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; &#8216;Diplomatic war&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 20:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/#comment-2004</guid>
		<description>[...] ith that. 	Dokdo &#8212; where the fun never stops! 	UPDATE: Curzon over at Coming Anarchy  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ith that. 	Dokdo &#8212; where the fun never stops! 	<span class="caps">UPDATE</span>: Curzon over at Coming Anarchy  [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curzon</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/comment-page-1/#comment-1996</link>
		<dc:creator>Curzon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/#comment-1996</guid>
		<description>&quot;Great comments over at Japan Today&quot;:http://www.japantoday.com/e/?content=news&amp;cat=9&amp;id=331729
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.japantoday.com/e/?content=news&amp;cat=9&amp;id=331729">Great comments over at Japan Today</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mutantfrog</title>
		<link>http://cominganarchy.com/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/comment-page-1/#comment-1991</link>
		<dc:creator>Mutantfrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2005/03/24/the-year-of-korea-japan-friendship/#comment-1991</guid>
		<description>You are leaving out many of the nastier things that the Japanese did to the Koreans, but this is all pretty irrelevant when we&#039;re talking about a bunch of completely uninhabited rocks that are only significant for the sea territorial rights that come with them. There were no suffering natives of Dokdo (Takeshima) whose sacrifices must not be forgotten. Noone lives there, noone has ever lived there, and noone ever will. This is nothing but a dispute over economic resources (fishing rights, and exploratory rights for possible natural gas deposits), and for either country to wrap it up in a bunch of nationalistic rhetoric is just pathetic. Roh&#039;s comments were just over the top. This &#039;Takeshima Day&#039; was declared by an insignificant local government, not Tokyo. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are leaving out many of the nastier things that the Japanese did to the Koreans, but this is all pretty irrelevant when we&#8217;re talking about a bunch of completely uninhabited rocks that are only significant for the sea territorial rights that come with them. There were no suffering natives of Dokdo (Takeshima) whose sacrifices must not be forgotten. Noone lives there, noone has ever lived there, and noone ever will. This is nothing but a dispute over economic resources (fishing rights, and exploratory rights for possible natural gas deposits), and for either country to wrap it up in a bunch of nationalistic rhetoric is just pathetic. Roh&#8217;s comments were just over the top. This &#8216;Takeshima Day&#8217; was declared by an insignificant local government, not Tokyo.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
