The Economist has a great article on Russia’s quagmire in Chechnya and the spreading violence that is overtaking the entire region.
I’d recommend reading the article, but a few choice segments are included below.
Devilishly complex ethnic divisions, within and between republics; ancient but persistent grudges; a Babel of languages; clan-based sub-rivalries; war with Russia, from the tsars to Vladimir Putin, Russia’s current president: such is the historical inheritance of the north Caucasus. Perhaps the most influential tragedy occurred during the second world war. A teacher in Zilgi, a predominantly Muslim village outside Beslan, says that, after the school siege, when her pupils ask her the eternal Russian question””?who is to blame?””?she gives a one-word answer: Stalin.
To live with this legacy””?and to make the most of the powers conferred on Russia’s
autonomous republics by the Soviets, which they kept when the Soviet Union collapsed””?the region needs strong, independent leaders. Instead it has communist relics, and ruling clans that monopolise local industry. As in the rest of Russia, business and politics are corrosively intertwined, and corruption is rampant.
While the US seems to be winning the war on terror, Russia’s mess in the northern Caucasus region is getting progressively worse.
The big risk is simply that more and more of the north Caucasus may slip into lawlessness and drift out of Moscow’s orbit. After his meddling in Ukraine, pundits talked of Mr Putin’s plans to reconstitute the Russian empire. But, in a sense, Russia is already its own empire. The possibility that it may one day crumble as the Soviet Union did is Mr Putin’s central fear. The neglect of the north Caucasus may eventually lead to that fear’s realisation.
And with a declining population, widespread alcohol and drug problems, and a messy mix of autocracy and oligarchy that reveals capitalism at its worst, the worst in Chechnya, and in Russia, has yet to come.
autonomous republics by the Soviets, which they kept when the Soviet Union collapsed””?the region needs strong, independent leaders. Instead it has communist relics, and ruling clans that monopolise local industry. As in the rest of Russia, business and politics are corrosively intertwined, and corruption is rampant.
Pingback: Anonymous
Well, Stalin forcefully resettled much of the Chechnyan population to Siberia and treated them horrible, and this is what led directly to the current situation. But while modern problems can be traced directly to Stalin, they don’t stop there. Why did Stalin treat the Chechnyans so badly? Simple, payback. Many Chechnyans sided with the Nazis during their failed invasion of Russia during WW2, and everything Stalin did to them was basically retribution for being collaborators. But it doesn’t stop there either. The reason they sided with the Nazis was because they had a history of being treated poorly by their Russian overlords and believed Hitler’s promises of increased freedom (which I imagine they would have regretted had the Reich broken Russia). And of course one of the reasons that they were treated badly is because they were a Muslim minority inside a strongly Christian country (before the Bolsheviks took over that is).
With such a tangled history, I think this will be a lot like the Israeli/Palestine conflict. Two sides with blood on their hands each blaming each other for everyone’s sins, but with no way to really track down the source of the blame to any single cause; everyone more interested in blame than solutions, and eternal low intensity conflict between one side that could easily crush the other in direct military conflict, but can never totally defend against innocent looking civilians completely willing to die.