Comments on: Putin backs Bush http://cominganarchy.com/2004/10/18/putin-backs-bush/ Speak Victorian, Think Pagan Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:13:54 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Saru http://cominganarchy.com/2004/10/18/putin-backs-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-47 Saru Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:21:06 +0000 http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2004/10/18/putin-backs-bush/#comment-47 You're right about that. I take it you also heard about LDP SG Takabe's comment? From the Nikkei Net on 10/15/05: 「㔚±ãƒªãƒ¼æ°Â?ãÂ?¯åŒ—æœÂ?鮮唢Â?題㔚'ï¼'Ã¥”ºÂ½Ã©”““ãÂ?§ã”š”žÃ£”šÂ?ãÂ?” Ã£Â?¨ãÂ?—ãÂ?¦ãÂ?”žÃ£”š”¹Ã£Â?Œã€Â?ãÂ?¨ã”š“ãÂ?§ã”š”šÃ£Â?ªãÂ?”žÃ¨Â©Â±Ã£Â? ã€Â?「ピ“ッ㔚·ãƒ¥å¤§çµ±é ˜ãÂ?§ãÂ?ªãÂ?”žÃ£Â?¨å”ºÂ°Ã£”š”¹Ã£â‚¬Â?〔šÃ¨”¡ÂªÃ¦Â°”˜Ã¥”¦Å¡Ã£Â?®æ­¦éƒ¨å”¹Â¤Ã¥Â¹Â¹Ã¤Âº”¹Ã©”¢Â·Ã£Â?¯15æ—¥ãÂ?®ãƒ©ã”šÂ¸Ã£”šÂªÃ§”¢ÂªÃ§Âµ”žÃ£Â?§ã€Â?米大統領éÂ?¸ãÂ?§ãƒ”“ッ㔚·ãƒ¥æ°Â?ãÂ?®å” Â?éÂ?¸ã”š'æ”?¯æŒÂ?ãÂ?™ã”š”¹Ã£Â?¨ãÂ?¨ã”š”šÃ£Â?«æ°”˜Ã¤Â¸Â»Ã¥”¦Å¡Ã£Â?®ã”šÂ±Ã£Æ’ªãƒ¼ä¸Šé™¢è­°å“¡ãÂ?®åŒ—æœÂ?鮮唢Â?é¡ŒãÂ?¸ãÂ?®å¯¾å¿œã”š'å¼·ãÂ?Â?攰¹åˆ¤ãÂ?—ãÂ?Ÿã€”š You’re right about that.
I take it you also heard about LDP SG Takabe’s comment?

From the Nikkei Net on 10/15/05:

ãââ¬ÃâãâšñãÃâêãÃâüæðÃ?ãÃ?ïÃÂ¥ÃââæÃâÃ?éîîÃÂ¥â¢Ã?éáÃâãâÅ¡’ïü’ÃÂ¥âºÃ½Ã©âââãÃ?çãâÅ¡âžÃ£âÅ¡Ã?ãÃ?â Ã£Ã?èãÃ?âãÃ?æãÃ?âžÃ£âÅ¡â¹Ã£Ã?Ãâãââ¬Ã?ãÃ?èãâÅ¡âãÃ?çãâÅ¡âšãÃ?êãÃ?âžÃ¨Ã©Ã±Ã£Ã?àãââ¬Ã?ãââ¬ÃâãÃâââãÃâÃâãâš÷ãÃâÃ¥åäççõñéàÃÅãÃ?çãÃ?êãÃ?âžÃ£Ã?èÃÂ¥âºÃ°Ã£âÅ¡â¹Ã£ââ¬Ã?ãââ¬âšèâ¡ÃªÃ¦Ã°âËÃÂ¥â¦Ã¡Ã£Ã?îæíæéÃâèÃÂ¥â¹Ã¤Ã¥ùùäúâ¹Ã©â¢Ã·Ã£Ã?ï15æâÃ¥ãÃ?îãÃâéãâšøãâšêçâ¢ÃªÃ§ÃµâžÃ£Ã?çãââ¬Ã?çñóÃ¥äççõñéàÃÅéÃ?øãÃ?çãÃâââãÃâÃâãâš÷ãÃâÃ¥æðÃ?ãÃ?îÃÂ¥â Ã?éÃ?øãâÅ¡’æâ?ïæÃâÃ?ãÃ?ââ¢Ã£âÅ¡â¹Ã£Ã?èãÃ?èãâÅ¡âšãÃ?ëæðâËäøûÃÂ¥â¦Ã¡Ã£Ã?îãâšñãÃâêãÃâüäøàéââ¢Ã¢Ã¨Ã­Ã°ÃÂ¥âáãÃ?îÃÂ¥ÃââæÃâÃ?éîîÃÂ¥â¢Ã?éáÃâãÃ?øãÃ?îÃ¥ïþÃ¥ÿÃâãâÅ¡’Ã¥ü÷ãÃ?Ã?æâ°Ã¹ÃÂ¥Ãâ Ã¤Ã£Ã?âãÃ?øãââ¬âÅ¡

]]> By: Curzon http://cominganarchy.com/2004/10/18/putin-backs-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-46 Curzon Mon, 18 Oct 2004 18:53:00 +0000 http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2004/10/18/putin-backs-bush/#comment-46 It is a no brainer. But the fact that these people are making the endorsements public is rather stunning. It is a no brainer. But the fact that these people are making the endorsements public is rather stunning.

]]> By: Saru http://cominganarchy.com/2004/10/18/putin-backs-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-45 Saru Mon, 18 Oct 2004 18:07:57 +0000 http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2004/10/18/putin-backs-bush/#comment-45 I'm going out on a limb here since this isn't my area, (so feel free to correct any misperceptions Mr. Younghusband) but when I heard about this on the radio this morning, my first thought was that Putin's choice is a no-brainer. As long as an administration that strongly backs the "War on Terror" is in the White House, it remains difficult (though not impossible) to make a clear distinction between Russian territorial ambitions and acts of terror because Putin can always hide behind the terror threat as an excuse, especially if the "terrorists" in question might be Muslim. I’m going out on a limb here since this isn’t my area, (so feel free to correct any misperceptions Mr. Younghusband) but when I heard about this on the radio this morning, my first thought was that Putin’s choice is a no-brainer. As long as an administration that strongly backs the “War on Terror” is in the White House, it remains difficult (though not impossible) to make a clear distinction between Russian territorial ambitions and acts of terror because Putin can always hide behind the terror threat as an excuse, especially if the “terrorists” in question might be Muslim.

]]> By: Curzon http://cominganarchy.com/2004/10/18/putin-backs-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-44 Curzon Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:24:09 +0000 http://www.cominganarchy.com/archives/2004/10/18/putin-backs-bush/#comment-44 Koizumi, Howard, Putin... where were those foreign leaders for Kerry? Koizumi, Howard, Putin… where were those foreign leaders for Kerry?

]]>